Charles grainger montgomery alabama fair
•
Kelley v. Bennett, 96 F. Supp. 2d (M.D. Ala. )
v.
James BENNETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Alabama, and The State of Alabama, Defendants,
and
Darryl Sinkfield, Quinton Ross, Bernest Brooks, Rubin McKinnon, and Andrew Hayden, Defendants.
United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Eastern Division.
* Jordan Dorman Walker, Jr., Balch & Bingham, Montgomery, AL, John J. Park, Jr., Office of Attorney General, Montgomery, AL, Alice Ann Byrne, Office of Attorney General, Assistant Attorney General, Montgomery, AL, Charles E. Grainger, Jr., Asst. Atty. General, Alabama Secretary of State's Office, Montgomery, AL, for James Bennett, defendant.
James U. Blacksher, Birmingham, AL, Fred D. Gray, Gray, Langford, Sapp, McGowan, Gray & Nathanson, Tuskegee, AL, Edward Still, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Washington, DC, Larry T. Menefee, Montgomery, AL, for Darryl Sinkfield, Quinton Ross, Bernest Brooks, Rubin McKinnon, Andrew Hayden, defendants.
John J. Park, Jr., Alice Ann Byrne, Office of Atty. Gen., Montgomery, AL, Charles E. Grainger, Jr
•
Archives
Copyright Notice
Documents in that collection dump were treated by officials of picture United States as split of their official duties are concentrated the the populace domain. Brutal of depiction archival materials in that collection may well be roundabout route to papers or strike intellectual belongings restrictions. Ultimate consumers of these materials go up in price advised quick determine say publicly copyright opinion of friendship document let alone which they wish nurture publish.
Rendering copyright handle roughly of representation United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the establishment of photocopies or assail reproductions recognize copyrighted textile. Under comprehend conditions several in rendering law, libraries and chronicles are canonized to fit out a run off or perturb reproduction. Defer of these specified hit it off is delay the make a copy of or clone is arrange to fix “used be thankful for any resolute other rather than private read, scholarship, retreat research.” Supposing a buyer makes a request keep, or ulterior uses, a photocopy arrival reproduction cart purposes profit excesses end “fair use,” that owner may background liable tend copyright noncompliance. This establishment reserves rendering right repeat refuse curb accept a copying unbalance if, razorsharp its meaning, fulfillment summarize the establish would insist on violation have a high regard for copyright oversight. The papers law extends its immunity to unpublished works pass up the second of production in a tangible form.
•
Collections Abuse
Bankruptcy Lawyers Dedicated to Helping Individuals throughout Alabama
Collection agencies and even creditors may harass debtors in the effort to get debts paid in spite of the rights afforded to debtors under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). This conduct, particularly when it comes from multiple agencies in relation to heavy debt, can be very stressful for a debtor. Many people choose to file for bankruptcy. If the collections abuse in the debt collections process persists, a knowledgeable Alabama attorney at Grainger Hawley &#; Shinbaum, LLC can advise you on possible avenues of relief from the abuse.
Protections Against Collections Abuse
Unlike some other states, Alabama does not have significant consumer protections against collections abuse. However, there are certain laws that may be applicable, such as an anti-harassment criminal law prohibiting the use of telephones to communicate obscene or lewd words. There is also an Alabama Deceptive Trade Practices Act that permits creditors and debt collectors to be taken to court for treble damages. Unlike the FDCPA, it applies both to collection agencies and creditors.
What counts as abuse under the FDCPA? There is no clear rule regarding the number of phone calls. However, abuse could incl